Tag Archives: taxonomy

EU Taxonomy Reporting Challenges

Findings.co challenges surrounding eu taxonomy regulations

 

The European Union’s commitment to fostering sustainable economic activities has led to the establishment of the EU Taxonomy, a regulatory framework aimed at promoting environmentally sustainable investments. As companies undertook the first round of reporting under this regulation, several challenges and misalignments have come to light, revealing the complexities that lie ahead. In this blog, I will explore the key observations and emerging best practices identified by the EU Platform on Sustainable Finance and the Sustainable Finance Advisory Committee of the German Federal Government (SFB). We also discuss the current challenges faced by organizations in complying with the EU Taxonomy regulations and the need for further guidance and clarity.

Usability Challenges and Misalignments

The EU Platform on Sustainable Finance’s report on data and usability of the EU Taxonomy provides valuable insights into the challenges faced by reporting entities. The usability challenges can be broadly categorized as structural, interpretive, and technical issues. Companies often struggle with incorrect templates, number formatting, and naming conventions, leading to inconsistencies in reporting. For instance, some entities may report “green share of revenues” instead of “Taxonomy-aligned turnover.” Interpretive issues arise when companies fail to follow the correct disclosure standards, reporting ambiguous terms instead of specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Additionally, technical issues emerge in determining eligible activities and meeting the technical screening criteria, which can vary across sectors.

Despite the usability challenges, the report highlights some best practices that can enhance the reporting process. Utilizing correct reporting templates and naming conventions from the outset can simplify reporting and improve consistency across disclosures. The Platform specifically recommends using the Taxonomy activity and numbering conventions found in the Delegated Act and maintaining consistency between mitigation and adaptation activities. By adhering to these conventions, companies can facilitate the comparability of data and ensure transparency for investors and stakeholders.

To ease the transition to the new reporting framework, supplementary guidelines and advice from the European Commission are encouraged. These additional resources could offer clarifications on specific reporting requirements, technical screening criteria, and eligible activities, helping companies navigate the complexities of the EU Taxonomy with greater confidence.

Challenges Faced by Asset Managers and Insurers

While some asset managers and insurers have reported their Green Investment Ratio (GIR) under Article 8, they encounter specific challenges due to limited coverage and inconsistent terminology. Data availability remains patchy, hindering accurate reporting of taxonomy alignment figures. A significant hurdle during the initial practical implementation revolves around the incomplete availability of data necessary for complying with the Taxonomy Regulation reporting. However, the Sustainable Finance Advisory Committee (SFB) endorses the approach and aims to contribute to its effective implementation by offering practical insights from various perspectives.

To improve data availability and consistency, the involvement of non-EU issuers and entities not currently mandated to report relevant figures could be crucial. Encouraging voluntary reporting from such entities could contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of taxonomy alignment across the financial industry.

Time-Frame and Legal Ambiguity Issues

One of the critical challenges pertains to the time-frame for implementing the Taxonomy Regulation. Structurally, “the SFB points out that the time between publication of regulation and required application is too short for companies to adapt adequately.” In addition, the limited data availability is explained by the sequencing of EU regulations, where investors are required to report their alignment before non-financial companies under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) scope do the same. As a result, the lack of data from certain sectors could hinder the ability of investors to accurately assess their investment products’ alignment with the taxonomy.

The absence of a centralized contact point for clarification and the need for international compatibility are additional challenges faced by reporting entities. A dedicated contact point within the European Commission could offer support and guidance, ensuring a more consistent interpretation and application of the Taxonomy Regulation across member states. Furthermore, harmonizing the taxonomy with international standards would foster global alignment and enhance the EU’s role as a leader in sustainable finance.

Compliance Challenges for Organizations

For companies, compliance with the EU Taxonomy Regulation has been a real challenge, mainly due to the complexity in interpreting concepts and criteria. With the regulation’s continuous evolution and integration of delegated acts, organizations must adapt to include all activities contributing to the environmental objectives. The challenges faced by organizations include a short time frame for compliance, setting up suitable processes, difficulty in sourcing information, and room for interpretation of regulatory requirements.

The short time frame between the issuance of the regulation and the reporting deadline has placed significant pressure on companies to establish robust systems and processes for identifying, assessing, and reporting on their economic activities’ taxonomy alignment. Many organizations have had to allocate substantial resources to implement these processes effectively, including upgrading reporting systems, training employees, and engaging with stakeholders to obtain the required data.

Another challenge is the difficulty in sourcing information for reporting purposes. Although the EU Taxonomy initially required only eligibility reporting for disclosures in 2022, the required information was not always directly available and needed to be determined through additional information generated within the company or requested through manual processes. This sourcing process can be time-consuming and may introduce uncertainties in the reporting.

Furthermore, the regulatory documents of the EU Taxonomy have shown a level of scope for interpretation, leading to questions and challenges concerning the proper interpretation of the regulatory requirements. This can result in varying approaches and discrepancies in reporting practices across different organizations.

Ensuring Reliable Sustainability Reporting

To ensure the reliability of sustainability reporting and minimize greenwashing risks, independent and high-quality audits are crucial. Though not mandatory yet, conducting external audits by statutory auditors is advisable to enhance the credibility of sustainability reporting. Independent audits can provide assurance to investors and stakeholders that reported taxonomy alignment figures are accurate and in compliance with the regulation.

Cracking the Code

The EU Taxonomy Regulations represent a significant step towards promoting sustainable economic activities in the European Union. However, the initial round of reporting has revealed several challenges, ranging from usability issues to data availability and legal ambiguities. To overcome these obstacles and effectively implement the Taxonomy Regulation, companies, policymakers, and stakeholders must work collaboratively to provide clearer guidance and enhance reporting processes. Only through a concerted effort can the EU Taxonomy fulfill its intended purpose of fostering a sustainable future for Europe and beyond. As the regulation continues to evolve and expand, addressing these challenges will be crucial in achieving a robust and transparent sustainable finance ecosystem that benefits both investors and the planet.

 

 

Complying With EU Taxonomy Regulations to Enhance Risk Management

Findings.co discusses how to comply and leverage the eu taxonomy to enhance risk management efforts

In today’s fast-paced regulatory landscape, businesses face the daunting task of complying with new regulations all the time. Recently, organizations have been faced with dealing with the EU Taxonomy regulations. With an increasing demand for sustainable practices and transparent reporting, organizations need to learn and adapt quickly to avoid falling behind their competitors. Leveraging the EU Taxonomy in risk management can drive data-driven decision making by providing a structured framework to assess and manage sustainability-related risks and opportunities.

The constantly evolving regulatory environment has made Taxonomy compliance a critical challenge for businesses. To meet investor expectations, consumer preferences, and regulatory requirements, organizations must navigate through complex sustainability criteria and efficiently report their compliance efforts. Make sure to read on to see how Findings can help – especially when it comes to staying compliant with the EU Taxonomy Regulation.


Understanding the Regulatory Demands

The EU Taxonomy sets guidelines and criteria for determining the environmental sustainability of economic activities. Compliance with this regulation is critical for many businesses operating within the European Union, aiming to foster a greener and more sustainable economy. These significant updates and changes will impact the way businesses assess and report their sustainability practices. It is crucial for organizations to understand these updates, ensuring compliance while mitigating the risk of penalties and reputational harm.

Leveraging Risk Management for Data Driven Decision Making

By implementing a robust risk management framework revolving around taxonomy, organizations can stay ahead and ensure compliance. Leveraging the EU Taxonomy in risk management drives data-driven decision making by providing a standardized and science-based framework to assess sustainability risks and opportunities. By integrating financial and sustainability data, companies can make informed choices that align with the EU’s environmental objectives, attract green investments, and proactively respond to changing regulatory landscapes.

Here are some of the key ways taxonomy can influence data driven decision making:

  1. Identifying Taxonomy-Eligible Activities: The first step in using Taxonomy for risk management is to identify the company’s Taxonomy-eligible activities. By mapping all activities against the Taxonomy’s criteria, businesses can determine which of their operations contribute to environmental sustainability. This helps in recognizing areas where the company aligns with the EU’s sustainability goals and where there may be potential risks due to misalignment.


  1. Environmental Risk Assessment: With the Taxonomy’s defined criteria for environmental sustainability, businesses can conduct a more rigorous environmental risk assessment. This assessment will go beyond traditional financial risks to include the evaluation of ecological impacts. It allows companies to identify areas where they might face future regulatory or reputational risks due to non-compliance or unsustainable practices.



  1. Data-Driven Eligibility and Alignment Scoring: The Taxonomy requires companies to link their financial data to sustainability assessments. This means companies need to gather data on their operations and expenditures related to Taxonomy-eligible activities. By collecting and analyzing this data, businesses can score their eligibility and alignment with the Taxonomy’s environmental objectives. Data-driven scoring provides a more objective and transparent view of a company’s sustainability performance.



  1. Risk Mitigation Strategies: Armed with data on eligibility and alignment, companies can develop risk mitigation strategies. For instance, they can focus on increasing investments and efforts in Taxonomy-aligned activities, which not only contribute to sustainability but also enhance their attractiveness to green investors. Simultaneously, they can work on transitioning away from activities that are not aligned with the Taxonomy to reduce exposure to future risks.



  1. Regulatory Compliance: The EU Taxonomy is likely to expand to cover more sectors and objectives in the future. By leveraging the Taxonomy in risk management, companies can proactively prepare for upcoming regulatory changes. They can stay ahead of the curve by identifying potential future Taxonomy-eligible activities and aligning their strategies accordingly. Findings recently announced two features, Assessment AI and Audit AI, which revolutionize the labor-intensive compliance landscape by enhancing efficiency and responsiveness for all stakeholders worldwide. For more in-depth information that’s easy to digest, check out the linked videos.



  1. Reporting and Transparency: Using the Taxonomy for risk management facilitates better reporting and transparency. Companies can disclose their Taxonomy-aligned activities, eligibility scores, and risk mitigation strategies in their sustainability reports. This enhances credibility and helps investors and stakeholders make informed decisions based on reliable data

  1. Continuous Improvement: The data-driven approach to Taxonomy integration allows companies to track their progress over time. By regularly assessing their eligibility and alignment, businesses can set benchmarks, monitor improvements, and continuously optimize their sustainability efforts.

By implementing a comprehensive Taxonomy risk management framework and leveraging Findings, organizations can proactively address the challenges posed by the EU Taxonomy regulation. This approach ensures compliance, mitigates risks, and unlocks opportunities for sustainable growth and competitive advantage. With automated risk identification and mitigation features, organizations can confidently make data-driven decisions while navigating the complex regulatory landscape, reinforcing their commitment to sustainability. Stay ahead, embrace Taxonomy risk management, and shape a sustainable future for your organization.

 

Discover Our Compliance Solutions Today

 

 

A Cheat Sheet of EU Sustainability Regulations

Findings.co cheat sheet of EU Sustainability Regulations

Staying Compliant in 2023

Sustainability reporting regulations have become increasingly important for businesses worldwide. The European Union (EU) is at the forefront of this movement, implementing regulations to enhance the consistency, accuracy, and transparency of sustainability reporting. Below, I will provide a comprehensive overview of some of the most critical EU sustainability regulations to keep in mind in 2023. Sustainability measures have become an integral part of business operations, irrespective of the size of the company. Companies can no longer ignore the growing number of sustainability reporting laws and regulations emerging globally. Navigating this complex landscape can be daunting, with terms like SFDR, CSDR, and NFRD, among others. To help you stay informed, I will highlight key EU sustainability regulations that are important to note in 2023.


EU Taxonomy

The EU Taxonomy is a classification system that establishes a list of economic activities considered sustainable. It aims to combat greenwashing and assist investors in selecting environmentally conscious investments. The EU Taxonomy evaluates investments based on their contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation, alignment with circular economy principles, impact on pollution, and effect on water and biodiversity. Large companies began reporting their alignment with the EU Taxonomy on January 1, 2023. For a more in depth explanation of EU taxonomy, check out our free eGuide below!

 


Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR)

Originating from the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) regulation aims to address concerns about greenwashing, where firms make exaggerated or misleading sustainability claims about their investment products, leading to potential consumer harm and reduced trust in sustainable investments. The proposals focus on building transparency and trust by introducing labels to help consumers navigate the market and ensure that sustainability-related terms in product naming and marketing are accurate and proportional to the product’s sustainability profile. The consultation targets FCA-regulated firms, industry groups, consumer groups, policymakers, academics, and other stakeholders. This initiative is part of the FCA’s commitment to promote trust and integrity in ESG-labeled instruments and products as outlined in the ESG Strategy and Business Plan, contributing to the Government’s Roadmap to Sustainable Investing. 


EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), implemented by the European Parliament, focuses on enhancing transparency in the sustainable investment market. It aims to prevent misleading environmental claims (greenwashing) and increase investment in sustainable products for a transition to a low-carbon economy. The SFDR categorizes investment products into three groups based on their degree of sustainability. It requires asset managers and investment advisers to disclose how they address Sustainability Risks and Principal Adverse Impacts and the three categories of products go into “Article 6,” “Article 8,” and “Article 9” based on their sustainability considerations. The regulation rolled out in two phases, with core disclosures effective in March 2021 and enhanced disclosures in January 2023. Regulators continue to provide guidance on these disclosures as industry understanding evolves. 


Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) expands on the existing Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) to address structural weaknesses in current ESG regulations. CSRD came into force on January 5, 2023, requiring approximately 50,000 companies to report on sustainability, including a broader set of large companies and listed SMEs. The new rules aim to provide investors and stakeholders with the necessary information to assess investment risks related to climate change and sustainability issues. 

Companies subject to the CSRD will have to report according to European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which will be developed by the EFRAG and tailored to EU policies while aligning with international standardization initiatives. The directive also mandates companies to have their sustainability information audited and introduces digitalization of sustainability information. 

The CSRD will be implemented in the 2024 financial year, and companies will need to comply with the new reporting requirements for reports published in 2025. The European Commission has also opened a public feedback period on draft sustainability reporting standards, considering feedback received before finalizing the standards for scrutiny by the European Parliament and Council. These new regulations represent a significant step towards promoting sustainability and responsible business practices within the EU corporate landscape.


Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)

The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is a pending EU proposal that will require large EU companies and non-EU companies with large EU undertakings to exercise due diligence across their business lines and value chains. It aims to prevent human rights and environmental violations. The draft proposal was approved by the EU Parliament on June 1, 2023, and negotiations with member states will follow. Due diligence obligations may come into effect as early as 2025.

The rules will apply to specific categories of companies. Firstly, large EU limited liability companies will be affected, categorized into two groups. Group 1 includes approximately 9,400 companies with 500 or more employees and a net turnover of over EUR 150 million worldwide. Group 2 comprises about 3,400 companies operating in high-impact sectors, such as textiles, agriculture, and mineral extraction, with at least 250 employees and a net turnover of over EUR 40 million worldwide. For Group 2, the rules will be applicable two years later than for Group 1. Additionally, non-EU companies will also come under scrutiny. Approximately 2,600 companies in Group 1 and 1,400 in Group 2, active within the EU and generating turnover thresholds aligned with the mentioned criteria, will be subject to the new rules. It’s important to note that micro companies and SMEs will not be directly affected by these proposed rules. However, supporting measures for SMEs will be provided, which may have indirect effects on them.


Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR)

The Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) policy, introduced by the UK Government, requires organizations to include energy consumption and carbon emission data in their annual reports. It aims to expand reporting to a broader range of companies and promote energy efficiency initiatives to reduce carbon footprints. The SECR applies to large UK companies, including quoted and unquoted companies, as well as limited liability partnerships. The reports must include information on energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and energy efficiency measures undertaken. 


Circular Economy Action Plan

The Circular Economy Action Plan is an initiative by the European Commission to promote a circular economy, reducing pressure on natural resources, and achieving climate neutrality and biodiversity conservation by 2050. Really, the goal is to make sustainability a norm. The plan aims to strengthen the eco-design of products, increase recycling rates, reduce landfilling, and promote sustainable consumption and production practices. It includes measures such as extended producer responsibility, eco-design requirements, and waste reduction targets. The plan was published in March 2020 and will be implemented gradually over the coming years. To achieve these objectives, the European Commission plans to implement all 35 actions listed in the plan. Additionally, a monitoring framework has been established to assess progress towards a circular economy and its benefits. This framework includes indicators to monitor material efficiency, consumption within planetary boundaries, and support the European Green Deal’s climate neutrality goals.


EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)

The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is a key policy instrument in the EU’s efforts to combat climate change. It is a cap and trade system operating in EU countries, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway. It aims to limit greenhouse gas emissions from various sectors, including the energy industry, manufacturing, aviation, and maritime transport. The system covers approximately 40% of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions and is set to include emissions from maritime transport starting in 2024. Under the cap and trade principle, a cap is placed on the total amount of greenhouse gasses that covered operators can emit. This cap is reduced over time to ensure overall emissions decrease. Operators buy or receive emissions allowances within the cap, and they can trade these allowances with others. This creates a market for emissions allowances, encouraging emission reductions and investments in low-carbon technologies. Operators must surrender enough allowances to cover their emissions annually, and failure to do so results in heavy fines. If an operator reduces its emissions, it can keep the extra allowances for future use or sell them to others needing more allowances. 

The EU ETS covers various sectors, including electricity and heat generation, energy-intensive industries like steel and cement production, aviation within the European Economic Area, and maritime transport. Participation is mandatory for certain-sized companies in these sectors, with exceptions for some small installations under certain conditions.


Stay Compliant!

For businesses operating within the European Union, adhering to these sustainability regulations is not only a legal obligation in many cases, but also an opportunity to play a crucial role in building a sustainable and resilient future. Compliance with these regulations is essential to demonstrate a commitment to environmental responsibility, social well-being, and corporate governance best practices. As companies strive to meet these regulatory requirements, it is vital to establish robust systems and processes for accurate and transparent sustainability reporting. By doing so, businesses can effectively manage risks associated with non-compliance, foster trust with stakeholders, and seize the potential advantages of sustainable practices, including increased attractiveness to environmentally conscious investors and consumers.

The regulations discussed in this cheat sheet, including SDR, SFDR, EU Taxonomy, CSRD, CSDDD, SECR, Circular Economy Action Plan, and EU ETS, cover a wide range of environmental, social, and governance aspects. It is important for companies to familiarize themselves with these regulations, and monitor updates. embracing sustainability and staying compliant with the EU’s evolving sustainability regulations is not merely a box-ticking exercise but an ongoing commitment to creating a positive impact on the planet and society. 



Learn About Our ESG Solutions

Unveiling the Power of ESG Stakeholders

Who are the stakeholders influencing ESG investing?

Overview

  • ESG stakeholders, including investors, nonprofits, governments, customers, and employees, collectively drive and shape ESG metrics, promoting sustainability and responsible business practices.

  • Investors play a significant role by utilizing ESG criteria and ratings to identify companies that prioritize environmental and social responsibility, while nonprofits and NGOs advocate for ESG regulations and reporting frameworks.

  • Government regulations worldwide, such as those implemented by the EU, encourage companies to embrace sustainability and accurately report their ESG performance. Additionally, customer demand for ethical brands and employee expectations for purpose-driven work further push companies to adopt ESG values.


The Influence of ESG Stakeholders in Driving ESG Metrics


As the importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors continues to gain traction in the business world, a wide range of stakeholders is playing a crucial role in shaping and driving ESG metrics. From investors and nonprofit organizations to governments and employees, these stakeholders are collectively pushing for a more sustainable and responsible approach to business. This blog post, I will explore the different groups of ESG stakeholders and how they are influencing the implementation and reporting of ESG programs.


Investors and ESG Ratings


There’s a growing question of “are ESG investors underperforming?” With a prevalence of ESG in private markets increasing, a significant rise in the number of private equity firms signing the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) and raising $2.5 trillion in capital has also increased. However, there is limited data on ESG fund performance, and analysis shows no significant performance differences between PRI signatories and non-signatories. Bloomberg Intelligence predicts that the market size of ESG investments will reach $50 trillion by 2025, nearly three times the level in 2014. And with this in mind, investors are playing a significant role in driving ESG metrics. After all, many do utilize ESG criteria and ratings to identify companies that prioritize environmental and social responsibility. Raters and score providers are also amplifying the impact of ESG leaders by spotlighting purpose-driven companies through their sustainability rankings and reports.


Nonprofits and NGOs as Catalysts


Nonprofit organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are at the forefront of advocating for ESG regulations, standards, and reporting frameworks. Organizations like the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) are working towards establishing consistent and transparent ESG guidelines. Through their research, advocacy efforts, and collaborations, nonprofits and NGOs are shaping the ESG landscape and encouraging businesses to adopt sustainable practices.


Government Regulations


Governments worldwide are recognizing the need for ESG regulations to protect human rights and the environment. Countries such as Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the European Union (EU) have introduced new ESG disclosure requirements and due diligence standards. The EU, in particular, has taken significant steps by implementing various regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence, EU Taxonomy, Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) reporting, and Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). These regulations create a legal framework that drives companies to embrace sustainability and report their ESG performance accurately.


Customer Demand for Ethical Brands


Consumers are increasingly drawn to ethical brands, placing pressure on businesses to prioritize ESG practices. According to surveys, 74% of customers consider ethical corporate practices and values as a crucial factor when choosing a brand. Furthermore, a significant percentage (66%) of consumers plan to make more sustainable or ethical purchases in the coming months. To cater to this demand, companies are adopting sustainability initiatives, including carbon-labeling on products, to provide transparency and facilitate informed consumer choices.


Employee Expectations and Social Impact


Employees have become increasingly conscious of the impact their organizations have on society and the environment. They want to work for companies that align with their values and contribute positively to the world. A survey revealed that 93% of employees believe that companies must lead with purpose, while 65% feel that organizations should aim to leave their people “net better off” through work. Businesses that prioritize ESG values and make a positive impact on people and the planet are likely to see higher levels of employee satisfaction and attract top talent. Moreover, social impact has become an essential aspect of corporate philanthropy, with companies increasing community investments and providing opportunities for employees to engage in social initiatives.


ESG Stakeholders Pave the Way for a Sustainable Future


In short, ESG stakeholders, including investors, nonprofits, governments, customers, and employees, collectively drive and shape ESG metrics. The growing interest in ESG investing, the influence of ESG rating agencies, and the demand for ethical brands from customers all contribute to the momentum behind sustainable business practices. Additionally, nonprofits and NGOs drive the establishment of ESG regulations and reporting frameworks, while governments are implementing legal requirements to ensure corporate accountability. As employees prioritize purpose-driven work and communities expect businesses to give back, organizations are compelled to integrate ESG considerations into their operations. By recognizing and responding to the diverse interests of ESG stakeholders, businesses can thrive in a changing landscape and contribute positively to the world.




Accelerate Your ESG Journey With Findings

Supply Chain Risk Monitoring as a Service
Join us today
Supply Chain Risk Monitoring as a Service
Join us today
Waitlist signup

Welcome to Findings

Let's go over some details to setup your tailor-made account


Please fill your details below and click "Next" to create your account:

Payment

Feature
Startup
Business
Enterprise
Price
$10 / Month
$10 / Month
$25 / Month
VDPaaS
Alerts
Assessments
Integrated Apps
API
Join today and scan ALL YOUR VENDORS for FREE*
* FREE VENDOR SCAN for all of your vendors during your first month.
Feature
Startup
Business
Enterprise
Price
$25 / Month
$200 / Month*
Contact Us
Free vendors scan for 1 month
Findings search engine
Rapid security and compliance profile
Profile/showcase engagements per year
5
40
Unlimited
Multi/unlimited showcase use cases
Showcase compliance badge for your website
Best practice self-assessment
1 Findings or 1 BYOC
Assessment response automation
Personalizable, branded security & compliance showcase page
File/evidence repository
OKTA
DKIM
Out-of-the-box TPRM
20 vendors +
20 rating scans
50 vendors +
50 rating scans
Support
Email
Priority via Phone / Email
Internal Workflows (SO/BO)
Onboarding and customization account setup
*Price for every 40 engagements
Automate assessment response and showcase your cybersecurity posture
Supply Chain Risk Monitoring as a Service
Join us today
.
.
.
.

Thank you for signing up!

Supply Chain Risk Monitoring as a Service
Join us today
.
.
.
.

Thank you for signing up!